.jpg "Research Chemical Sciences")
hi, i ran first cycle, test only 250 per week...gained about 15lbs and strength went way up. Im 52, 6'3" weighed 227 at start...finished up at 242. the only issue i had was that bp went from 120/78 to 145/90 quickly...I mean within a few weeks. the highest was 150/93. Now, i admit...i didn't do very much cardio at all. I have a decent diet, but i'm not going to say that i ate perfectly clean...i had to get some extra calories to gain. Now, in the 4 weeks since the end of my 12 week cycle, I'm lifting in morning...cardio in afternoon, cleaned diet up. I've lost 10 lbs with no loss in strength. I decided to just cruise on 100 test per week on the 3 third week after cycle. I feel good...but, 52 isnt 32 and the aches and pains from lifting heavy and years have made it tough to push through some days.
My question is, do you think test/deca cycle at 200 test/200-250 deca would cause the same rise in BP? like I said, its not sky high..but, I could def feel the rise. I would of couse use an IA and caber. Thinking about starting after christmas and do 12 weeks. Would cardio at start make a difference in BP...my BP this morning was 125/85...so, close to my pre cycle normal. I like the thought of deca relieving some joint pain..plus added size and muscle that I could cut the extra weight after cycle. Your thoughts?
My question is, do you think test/deca cycle at 200 test/200-250 deca would cause the same rise in BP? like I said, its not sky high..but, I could def feel the rise. I would of couse use an IA and caber. Thinking about starting after christmas and do 12 weeks. Would cardio at start make a difference in BP...my BP this morning was 125/85...so, close to my pre cycle normal. I like the thought of deca relieving some joint pain..plus added size and muscle that I could cut the extra weight after cycle. Your thoughts?
