Mk677 vs HGH

[Jimbo]

Hey bros - just curious of your thoughts on Mk677 vs HGH.

I've heard that 25mg of MK yields about the same as 4IUs HGH - would you think that's about accurate?

What about sides and coming off?

I ran MK at 12.5 mg / day for a few months with great gains and no sides at all. I stopped because I ran out and also because I am trying some HCG mono therapy and wanted to judge the effects of that compound by itself.

My goal is enhanced healing (the MK really did the trick) but I am considering real HGH so I'm curious of your thoughts between them.

One thing for sure - MK is a much cheaper alternative.

Thanks.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Gymjunkie38]

Real growth is always gonna be better question is how much money you got you can get decent results from mk677 for couple hundred a month you need a couple grand too run a good dose of growth ( pharm grade)

Sent from my LG-H631 using Tapatalk

 

[Tazz]

definitely stick with mk677 for now at the level your at, hgh injections can get boring real quick , and will definitely put a dent in the wallet, that edge that hgh gives over mk isn't really all that worth it unless you need that edge since your competing, etc


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[[9oNe6]BillyD@kid]

One of my main reasons i prefer 677 over GH is the constant pinning BS i cant stand it. Plus 677 is only a fraction of the cost, which happens to be my second reason for preferring 677

 

[DylanGemelli]

there is NO WAY to determine a translation as to how many ius is the equivalent to mg in 677... what i can tell you is this... its the next best thing to real hgh, its a fraction of the cost, its much easier to dose, its very very effective and it will yield huge results... i would definitely consider it bro... you run it for a year without cycling off... here is the link for the best 677 you can find...

https://www.sarmsx.com/nutrobal-mk-677