Ok ..obviously I did not explain this correctly. The molecule has been studied since 1985.It is not new. Ok..in the original study there was group A. A got c60 in olive oil. GroupB got just olive oil. GroupC got water injections. The results showed that group A out lived Group C by 10 years. That is true isn't it? Totally correct statement isn't it? BUT some shyster who wants to sell it as a miracle forgets to mention that groupB outlived groupC by 9 years. So really what this study said was the olive oil made mice live longer. The study was considered useless by the scientific community who said nothing can be discerened from the study. The was the final synopsis. A simple ommision about group B made this stuff seem like a miracle.
Next problem..you said rats! The shysters said rats...except that it was in mice not rats.Mice are not considered good animals for research anymore because their DNA is fragile. Rats have a lot of dna in common with humans. So the question was WHY did they use mice instead of rats.
Third problem. They showed a slide of how great the group A tissue was in the liver. Then they use the same exact slide to show how good the kinney tissue looked. The shyster also forgot to show how good the tissue looked in group B. So the conclusion is that groupA and groupB had similar results. GroupC did not do as well. This is not new, and I have read about it for years.