[Research] Taken SARMs? Help a researcher out and give your feedback!

[ResearcherJim]

I constantly read conflicting information about SARMs online. I understand that every person will have different results but I wanted to explore it further with a very brief survey to see if I could correlate any data.

With very little human clinical research, this survey (https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/VXN85TN) may provide a better understanding of the effects of SARMs. The more feedback, the richer the data so please share with anyone or any community that has any wisdom to bestow on this topic!

If you have any feedback to make this survey better, please let me know - or any ideas of further research I can conduct.

Fill out one survey per cycle, rather than your overall experience with SARMs (if you've run more than one cycle). If you've run 20 cycles, I'm not expecting you to sit and do 20 surveys and there's no way to control confederate bias with such a simple survey - so please do as many as you are willing to give feedback on.

 

[RickRock]

I'd be curious to see the results of the survey. One thing to keep in mind is that a lot of results may be skewed by poor sarm quality by using subpar products from those type of companies.

 

[ResearcherJim]

I'll be posting the results once I have a significant sample size. Not overly sure what the best way to collect data would be, other than finding appropriate forums - I usually buy a sample size but this one's a little trickier to gather.

Agree with you re: subpar SARM quality Rick. There are a few extraneous variables I can't mitigate but hopefully, with enough volume, some correlative data should reveal itself.

 

[DylanGemelli]

theres too many variables here and your never going to get accurate info because so many have had the wrong experience using shit products or fake products... you cannot possibly expect an accurate detail from that bro... im sorry but its a flawed survey... you wouldn't even know which companies have had issues etc... so i do think that its a great idea, but unfortunately, it will not be anywhere near accurate... ive had the opportunity to use excellent sarms products for many years so i know inside and out what they can do or i would never have put as much time and effort into them as i have and i am in HUGE disgust over the companies that try to get over on people because not only is it ethically wrong but it always gives the wrong indication of what sarms can actually do...

 

[bilalra1]

Perhaps if you confine the survey to a sample of people who have used SARMs from sarmsx only, then you may be able to collect accurate data about SARMs. But then the sample size will take a huge hit because you would be limited to people on this forum. But Dylan and Rick are right, the study would be too be flawed if you run it the way you proposed.

 

[jp1957]

yea, limit the scope, and I'll jump on it. But we see so many people come here fucked up from bogus sarms, its saddening.

 

[DylanGemelli]

Perhaps if you confine the survey to a sample of people who have used SARMs from sarmsx only, then you may be able to collect accurate data about SARMs. But then the sample size will take a huge hit because you would be limited to people on this forum. But Dylan and Rick are right, the study would be too be flawed if you run it the way you proposed.

i agree, that would be the best bet honestly... you have to find a reputable company first (good luck with finding many) and then judge based on that... completely agree

 

[jmmdm2]

Would the survey reflect results by compound? Agreeing with the replies above, I think your data would provide a false expectation if not further segregated by source. I tried IML Osta and thought it was something good but the SARMSX products have produced consistent results on another level. Need to compare apples to apples but what other reputable sarms sources exist besides SARMSX?