What's up everyone! I'm thrilled to be joining this forum as a newcomer to SARMs and the forum community as a whole. I'm eager to learn from those of you who have years of experience with SARMs and forum posting.
To give some background, my only previous experience with SARMs was a short 6-week cycle of RAD-140 (15mg/day), followed by a 6-week break, and then another short 6-week cycle of RAD-150 (20mg/day) paired with Cardarine (20mg/day). Now, I'm looking for feedback on my proposed 12-week SARMs cycle, which I'm excited about.
Here's the cycle I'm considering:
1-12 RAD-140 TESTOLONE (gel) 20mg/day dosed once a day in the morning.
1-12 ACP-105 (gel) 20mg/day, split into two doses - 10mg in the morning and 10mg 4-6 hours later.
1-12 S-4 ANDARINE (Polycell Formula) 50mg/day, split into two doses - 25mg in the morning and 25mg 4-6 hours later.
(I also already have my Melonotan I peptide I'll be using to keep me tan all summer)
As for PCT, I intend to use:
9-12 N2Generate [I'll purchase this when it's back in stock.]
13-16 Nolvadex 40/20/20/20 [Do any of you know a reputable source for Nolvadex?]
13-16 GW-501516 CARDARINE (gel) 20 mg/day dosed once a day in the morning.
I have never run a SARM longer than 6 weeks and I have never stacked SARMs before so I am very excited. All the SARMs I'll be using will be purchased from Umbrella Labs.
I'm 28 years old, and I've already done my pre-cycle bloodwork, although unfortunately, I forgot to request the full hormonal panel. I don't know what my LH and FSH are at, however I can confirm that my testosterone is at 997. I also plan to do bloodwork after 6 weeks in the cycle and post-cycle bloodwork after week 16.
Lastly, I'd like to ask for some feedback from experienced users. Are ACP-105 and S-4 both worth keeping in this stack, or are they so similar that I should drop one? Your insights would be greatly appreciated. Thank you all in advance! (This is what I understand S-4 vs ACP-105: ACP-105 is just a little bit stronger than S-4, both are great for muscle hardening, but S-4 is better than ACP-105 for muscle hardening, both are really great for strength, strength is similar either way you could argue either one, more fat loss with ACP-105, both excellent for endurance, but the endurance with ACP-105 is a little bit better than S-4, ACP-105 adds more lean muscle than S-4 & they're both about the same in vascularity)
My aim is to increase my lean muscle mass and size while enhancing muscle density and vascularity.
Benefits I expect from this cycle:
To give some background, my only previous experience with SARMs was a short 6-week cycle of RAD-140 (15mg/day), followed by a 6-week break, and then another short 6-week cycle of RAD-150 (20mg/day) paired with Cardarine (20mg/day). Now, I'm looking for feedback on my proposed 12-week SARMs cycle, which I'm excited about.
Here's the cycle I'm considering:
1-12 RAD-140 TESTOLONE (gel) 20mg/day dosed once a day in the morning.
1-12 ACP-105 (gel) 20mg/day, split into two doses - 10mg in the morning and 10mg 4-6 hours later.
1-12 S-4 ANDARINE (Polycell Formula) 50mg/day, split into two doses - 25mg in the morning and 25mg 4-6 hours later.
(I also already have my Melonotan I peptide I'll be using to keep me tan all summer)
As for PCT, I intend to use:
9-12 N2Generate [I'll purchase this when it's back in stock.]
13-16 Nolvadex 40/20/20/20 [Do any of you know a reputable source for Nolvadex?]
13-16 GW-501516 CARDARINE (gel) 20 mg/day dosed once a day in the morning.
I have never run a SARM longer than 6 weeks and I have never stacked SARMs before so I am very excited. All the SARMs I'll be using will be purchased from Umbrella Labs.
I'm 28 years old, and I've already done my pre-cycle bloodwork, although unfortunately, I forgot to request the full hormonal panel. I don't know what my LH and FSH are at, however I can confirm that my testosterone is at 997. I also plan to do bloodwork after 6 weeks in the cycle and post-cycle bloodwork after week 16.
Lastly, I'd like to ask for some feedback from experienced users. Are ACP-105 and S-4 both worth keeping in this stack, or are they so similar that I should drop one? Your insights would be greatly appreciated. Thank you all in advance! (This is what I understand S-4 vs ACP-105: ACP-105 is just a little bit stronger than S-4, both are great for muscle hardening, but S-4 is better than ACP-105 for muscle hardening, both are really great for strength, strength is similar either way you could argue either one, more fat loss with ACP-105, both excellent for endurance, but the endurance with ACP-105 is a little bit better than S-4, ACP-105 adds more lean muscle than S-4 & they're both about the same in vascularity)
My aim is to increase my lean muscle mass and size while enhancing muscle density and vascularity.
Benefits I expect from this cycle:
- Fat Loss (all 3)
- Endurance (all 3)
- Strength (all 3)
- Overall Recomposition (all 3)
- Size (RAD-140, ACP-105)
- Muscle Hardness (mostly ACP-105, S-4)
- Vascularity (mostly ACP-105, S-4)
- Energy (ACP-105)
