21M , 5’8 163lbs, 14% body fat trying to walk around 10-12% assuming it don’t mess me up.
have ran 2 12 week cycles suggested by Dylan. Posted a thread recently and saw someone say sarms don’t cause acne. This was my only side effect and I didn’t have ANY acne before, it was 100% from cycle which i rather not get, but completely understand. (Attached photo).
Anyway been doing a lot of research lately, and am only believing someone on Reddit @Gainstician as they claim to be a moderator on this site. There claim that test only cycle is superior to any sarm (more benefits , less risks) is encouraging, and there claim that “sarms are more foreign to the body than test” does make some sense to me.
Instead of doing a cutting stack suggested by Dylan himself, out of curiosity if I was willing to do a test only cycle for a cut, would it be more effective than a sarm cycle? And would the risks be greater or fewer?
Just curious, I use this forum to learn and am certaintly gonna do wayyyyy more research before I just buy it
have ran 2 12 week cycles suggested by Dylan. Posted a thread recently and saw someone say sarms don’t cause acne. This was my only side effect and I didn’t have ANY acne before, it was 100% from cycle which i rather not get, but completely understand. (Attached photo).
Anyway been doing a lot of research lately, and am only believing someone on Reddit @Gainstician as they claim to be a moderator on this site. There claim that test only cycle is superior to any sarm (more benefits , less risks) is encouraging, and there claim that “sarms are more foreign to the body than test” does make some sense to me.
Instead of doing a cutting stack suggested by Dylan himself, out of curiosity if I was willing to do a test only cycle for a cut, would it be more effective than a sarm cycle? And would the risks be greater or fewer?
Just curious, I use this forum to learn and am certaintly gonna do wayyyyy more research before I just buy it