Test only vs Sarms

anytime you have hormonal changes, acne can occur... aside from gw501516 and 0742, mk677 and sr9009 and 9011, actual sarms can potentially cause acne but nowhere near to the extent of steroids... beyond that, you are far far far far too young to even be thinking about steroid use...

also, there are no mods on reddit that are on mods here
21M , 5’8 163lbs, 14% body fat trying to walk around 10-12% assuming it don’t mess me up.

have ran 2 12 week cycles suggested by Dylan. Posted a thread recently and saw someone say sarms don’t cause acne. This was my only side effect and I didn’t have ANY acne before, it was 100% from cycle which i rather not get, but completely understand. (Attached photo).

Anyway been doing a lot of research lately, and am only believing someone on Reddit @Gainstician as they claim to be a moderator on this site. There claim that test only cycle is superior to any sarm (more benefits , less risks) is encouraging, and there claim that “sarms are more foreign to the body than test” does make some sense to me.

Instead of doing a cutting stack suggested by Dylan himself, out of curiosity if I was willing to do a test only cycle for a cut, would it be more effective than a sarm cycle? And would the risks be greater or fewer?

Just curious, I use this forum to learn and am certaintly gonna do wayyyyy more research before I just buy it
Test superior imo
i was very on top of the skin care, it didn’t help much though, Which is why I was considering getting acutane. I heard some have taken it on cycle safely, I also realize it’s a strong compound and might not be a good mix
I would advise against Acutane if you really can help it. Side effects and toxicity not worth it if the acne now dreadful. Some good skin clearing routines should help tho and rubbing alcohol ona. Cotton pad wiped on the skin does wonders. Also a greens supplement powder would also help clean out the system and clear up skin.
Top Bottom