T
teku135
Guest
Whats the difference between gw and sr? which one is better for cutting.
That's really difficult to say bro. They are probably very equivelant though some may get better results with one over the other. They give similar results but work through different pathways. That's why they are so great stacked together. GW causes the body to burn its own fat for fuel, and sr raises your metabolism and metabolic rate to burn fat at an increased rate
Hard to say they treat people differently, I got 10 times more out of SR then GW for BF% loss, but that is just me
Same here,although the GW does make it easier to do more cardio.
I'm with you.. I felt the same way. I was really impressed with the outcome actually. Well worth the money when you're training right and eating clean. You just can't beat SARMS.
Technically it isn't and is a ppar agonist, but it is grouped with sarms and associated with them
(PM me for a price list for Biotech Labs and 10% discount)
T
teku135
Guest
from personal experiences, which is better for fat loss?
SR in my opinion is better for fat loss
This!!!!!!!
T
teku135
Guest
how does sr and gw compare to tren in terms of fat loss?
they are similar in many ways... lets put it this way, they are both highly effective... GW is more versatile... it will enhance your performance more and provide more benefits but for just straight fat loss, sr is slightly stronger... its main purpose is to correct metabolic disorders... GW is my personal preference because i feel like when you enhance your performance that you get the most out of it... and NOTHING can enhance your performance as much as GW does but SR is a bit stronger for fat loss... generally i recommend taking them both...
Similar threads
