PSL        esarms.com
bannednutrition.com
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Question about sarm cycle

  1. #1

    Question about sarm cycle

    Long time lurker, first time poster. Have been in the world of AAS for over a decade. Pretty much ran everything, Tren, growth, winny, slin to name a few. Haven’t ran a “cycle” for several years and have been on TRT for the past 3 years - running 250 mg of test per week.

    Looking into sarms due to personal reasons of not wanting to do gear again. With that being said here is what I am thinking.

    Quick stats - 5’9”, 180, roughly 12 percent bf. Been training for over a decade consistently. Follow a lot of the training principals of Dr Mike Israetel. Goal is recomp(which might be hard at this point in my life). Stay around 175-180 and drop to about 8 percent BF. Here is the game plan.

    TRT- 250mg week
    HGH- 1.5 IU per day

    Sarms -
    S4 50mg daily for 90 days
    GW 20mg daily for 90 days
    S-23 20mg split dose am and pm, days 30-90.

    Fire away!
    Last edited by BigGuy; 02-19-2019 at 08:52 PM.

  2. #2
    i love this , i'm a big fan of s-23 , just dose it 1h pre workout and enjoy , you may want to replace s4 with something more anabolic like ostarine or LGD since you have s 23 allready

  3. #3
    Good to hear about s-23! I’ve seen some negativity around it, but given my cycle history and the fact I’ll be in TRT it seems like it would line up with my goals of recomp/hardening up. I was under the impression that S4 was more anabolic than Ostarine?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    victoria , Australia
    Posts
    462
    Quote Originally Posted by BigGuy View Post
    Good to hear about s-23! I’ve seen some negativity around it, but given my cycle history and the fact I’ll be in TRT it seems like it would line up with my goals of recomp/hardening up. I was under the impression that S4 was more anabolic than Ostarine?
    Ive defiantly gained a lot more strength while on S4 then MK2866 however 2866 has good healing properties and defiantly can add some lean mass.

  5. #5
    im on the other end and not a fan of s23 at all... its highly suppressive, known as a male contraceptive with NO in depth studies whatsoever so you literally are a guinea pig for it... definitely not something i would go near.. results may be there but at what cost, you will not know and you will absolutely need a heavy pct with it...

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by DylanGemelli View Post
    im on the other end and not a fan of s23 at all... its highly suppressive, known as a male contraceptive with NO in depth studies whatsoever so you literally are a guinea pig for it... definitely not something i would go near.. results may be there but at what cost, you will not know and you will absolutely need a heavy pct with it...
    Dylan ... in your opinion, how would you compare S23 to oral steroids like Dianabol or Anadrol? Just as suppressive with less of the benefits?

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Healthy_Maven View Post
    Dylan ... in your opinion, how would you compare S23 to oral steroids like Dianabol or Anadrol? Just as suppressive with less of the benefits?
    Yes its definitely just as suppressive


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  8. #8
    Thanks for the reply, Dylan! Information was a bit scarce on s23. I did see info about it being Androgenic, suppressive, used as a contraceptive. With the fact that I’m on test year round I wasn’t too scared about being shut down; and being that I don’t want anymore kids, I wasn’t scared about not being able to have more... to your point, it seems still like a big unknown.

    Looking at the set up above, anything you would add instead?

  9. #9
    id personally switch out to rad140...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •