SARMs

[bildnant]

Hey ive done a test e cycle already and my question is running a SARM or 2 equivalent to running a test cycle? The SARMs are rather expensive though. I can get 10ml of test c or test e at 200-250 mg for like $33 but I always worry about the fact that it’s a cds3

 

[9th Wonder]

It doesn't make sense to compare the two. What are you trying to accomplish with the SARMS? Give goals, stats, training experience, age etc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[SpikedEggnog]

Hey ive done a test e cycle already and my question is running a SARM or 2 equivalent to running a test cycle? The SARMs are rather expensive though. I can get 10ml of test c or test e at 200-250 mg for like $33 but I always worry about the fact that it’s a cds3

no SARMS dont compare to TEST. but its like comparing apples to oranges. they are different compounds, different doses, and affect the body differently. TEST will be better then sarms for muscle gain and strength BUT it has side effects. SARMS have little to no side effects. so what they lack in anabolic they make up for in no sides. its a different species so to speak. SARMS are also easily administered, orally. thats alot easier then injecting yourself with a needle every week or more. sarms can also be legally obtained. unlike TEST. so there are pros and cons to both. but honestly they both have their place on and off cycle. SARMS make a perfect bridge or stack well with steroids because they enhance the cycle but dont add more sides or toxicity.

 

[DylanGemelli]

Hey ive done a test e cycle already and my question is running a SARM or 2 equivalent to running a test cycle? The SARMs are rather expensive though. I can get 10ml of test c or test e at 200-250 mg for like $33 but I always worry about the fact that it’s a cds3

test is the backbone of every cycle... of course its not comparable... its really not comparable to anything because without test, you dont have a cycle when talking about steroids... you can run sarms without test but ultimately test is stronger, of course however it also depends on your stats and goals... there's a lot of factors aside from just aside which is stronger or better... ultimately, its which is more suited for YOU personally, not anyone else.. what are your stats? age/height/weight/body fat? goals?

 

[RickRock]

Hey ive done a test e cycle already and my question is running a SARM or 2 equivalent to running a test cycle? The SARMs are rather expensive though. I can get 10ml of test c or test e at 200-250 mg for like $33 but I always worry about the fact that it’s a cds3

In what way are you trying to compare them? They couldn't be any more different honestly. Steroids obviouosly are more powerful than sarms but they also come with shutting you down and side effects. Sarms are good to be implemented a lot more different ways than steroids can as well. It all comes down to what your stats, goals, and experience is and what you are trying to accomplish. Otherwise there's no point in comparing the two

 

[JackSteel]

Everything has been said in regards to comparing them. In my opinion you don't use the two things for the same goals. SARMS for cutting for me and hormones for bulking. SARMS for improving your BMI and getting to a healthy place in the life and steroids for taking things to a higher level of hardcore muscle. They could be stacked together if one chooses but choosing between SARMS or steroids completely depends on goals and experience and age.


Phurious Pharma rep
[email protected]
'JS5' for 5% off your order!

 

[deanernathan]

Thanks

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk

 

[deanernathan]

test is the backbone of every cycle... of course its not comparable... its really not comparable to anything because without test, you dont have a cycle when talking about steroids... you can run sarms without test but ultimately test is stronger, of course however it also depends on your stats and goals... there's a lot of factors aside from just aside which is stronger or better... ultimately, its which is more suited for YOU personally, not anyone else.. what are your stats? age/height/weight/body fat? goals?

Thanks

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk

 

[jp1957]

If it wasnt for the shutdown, and likely possibility of not coming back from it, I'd be on test, its a hell of a lot cheaper than SARMS.

But if I had to go on trt for the rest of my life just for one blast cycle, its not worth the price difference.

 

[caleb18]

If it wasnt for the shutdown, and likely possibility of not coming back from it, I'd be on test, its a hell of a lot cheaper than SARMS.

But if I had to go on trt for the rest of my life just for one blast cycle, its not worth the price difference.

Would you really have to go on trt for the rest of your life after one cycle of just test?


No supplement beats hard work

 

[DylanGemelli]

Would you really have to go on trt for the rest of your life after one cycle of just test?


No supplement beats hard work

Be gets suppressed much easier than many and hes a bit older as well so it takes a toll more so as well

 

[RickRock]

Would you really have to go on trt for the rest of your life after one cycle of just test?


No supplement beats hard work

It depends on the individual. Older people have more difficulty recovering and it actually can happen to anyone. It's a gamble every time you cycle AAS Bcaa you never know if you'll fully recover or not