Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

SR9009 compared to GW-501516

dros

Member
Member
How would you describe these two in effects when you use them? With other sarms aswell as together if you have done that.

I'm looking to buy some more GW and S4 but may try SR9009 but it seems similar to GW and its not exactly cheap so I wanted to hear some of you guys personal opinions.

SR9009 vs GW-501516

Thanks
 
Last edited:
How would you describe these two in effects when you use them? With other sarms aswell as together if you have done that.

I'm looking to buy some more GW and S4 but may try SR9009 but it seems similar to GW and its not exactly cheap so I wanted to hear some of you guys personal opinions.

SR9009 vs GW-501516

Thanks

SR9009 corrects metabolic disorder and much of its focus is on increasing metabolism while increasing endurance and clearly enhancing weight loss

GW-501516 is the ultimate performance enhancer.... huge increases in endurance, prevention of muscle wastage, also treats cholesterol


ive done many videos and articles on both with any information you need... that's why i spent all the hours on them as i did...

here is a link to my articles... https://www.isarms.com/selective-androgen-receptor-modulators
 
Im aware and I have read it

I was thinking more of personal experience when it came to these sarms. How they felt and what they felt were more effective
 
Im aware and I have read it

I was thinking more of personal experience when it came to these sarms. How they felt and what they felt were more effective


i will always have GW over anything.. for me, its a must on everything i do regardless of the scenario.. i call it the ultimate performance enhancer with good reason...
 
i will always have GW over anything.. for me, its a must on everything i do regardless of the scenario.. i call it the ultimate performance enhancer with good reason...

Thanks for the quick answer Dylan and I personally agree from the sarms I've tried

GW is simply amazing
 
How long do you push it with GW?

16 weeks + pct? so in total say 19-20 weeks?

if you run gw as a stand alone then you dont need a pct... its non suppressive... in that case you go 16 weeks, rest 2-3 weeks then you can start again...
 
if you run gw as a stand alone then you dont need a pct... its non suppressive... in that case you go 16 weeks, rest 2-3 weeks then you can start again...

I was thinking more in conjunction with the triple stack

and is there a reason why you push for clomid instead of nolva for pct?
I was under the impression nolva is the more superior one of the two being that it also prevent gyno which clomid does not
 
I was thinking more in conjunction with the triple stack

and is there a reason why you push for clomid instead of nolva for pct?
I was under the impression nolva is the more superior one of the two being that it also prevent gyno which clomid does not


clomid is much better for recovery and as a stand alone, is much better than nolva to me... sarms dont convert to estrogen so what is the point of nolva over clomid, none...

if you run it in the triple stack then yes, a mini pct is required but you can stretch gw to 16 weeks...

you can use nolva is you want for sure but i will always opt for clomid first... if i was worried about estrogen in pct, i would go with aromasin and clomid over nolva if we are talking sarms but there is no concern there...
 
If I had to pick between the two, I would go gw every time. I've had a few years experience with it and loved it. However, with that said I did add sr9009 to it this summer and it took things to another level with performance, endurance, and fat loss. They have some great synergy together when stacked. Even though they have similar results, they work through different pathways to achieve that, which is why they work so well together

(PM me for a price list for Biotech Labs and 10% discount)
 
Top Bottom