I have a little bit of confusion about peptides and Sarms if CJC-1295 raises HGH then why would someone use MK-2677 for HGH release? whats better ? why use one over the other?
Peptides and Sarms
- Thread starter frotestone2
- Start date
it comes down to strength, ease of use, time you can use, side effects etc... mk677 is FAR stronger, can be ran longer, requires no injection, produces MORE results and far more rapid...
can stacking any peptides that are injectable can give the same HGH release as MK?
start stacking peptides and watch the sides grow... the more gh releasers you run, the far more prolactin issues as well as pct necessity... i have some videos out now and several others in editing discussing each peptide one by one... the beauty of 677 is that THERE IS NO PROLACTIN ISSUE whatsoever.. its literally the ONLY gh releaser that causes none... if your set on peptides, go for it... keep in mind the sides as well as you will be pinning 2-3 times per day, not to mention you have to time ALL your meals around it etc... there's not one thing fun about it but you'll see
it seems like Sarms are better to go with then peptides, is that correct?
you will find that sarms produce far more, at a much more rapid rate... peptides work very slowly and many times you can't see much happening.. they are a pain in the ass to use in general with the frequent injecting, reconstituting, storing etc... not to mention sarms are far more powerful in general...
a lot safer too!
so I guess you would recommend using no peptides, is that a fair statement o make?
there's two i like... cjc and hgh fragment... understand frag is not as strong but very good for fat burning... those are the only two i would recommend...
ok but I thought MK was better then cjc?
SARMS are always going to be a safer alternative, he was just telling you the peptides he likes.
mk>cjc>HGH frag was what he trying to get across
any of you guys ever hear of Follistatin?
buy t way where would I buy these peptides?
yes, stay away, blocks myostatin and many people report major increase in body fat while on due to this, not to mention it makes your tendons severely weak
bro, DO NOT, and i repeat DO NOT try to mix my words... i already told you it was... i told you every reason why sarms are superior and then you proceeded to ask if i recommended no peptides and i simply gave you the two i like... NEVER ONCE, NOT ONCE did i imply, indicate or anything else that they were even close to 677... just because i like something doesn't mean its stronger... i clearly said 677 was far superior...
good luck... even tom, who was the one person i thought you could always trust to buy from, is said to be selling garbage now... picking a peptide company is like your chances of winning the lotto at this point... i dont even know where to tell you to go anymore because i don't trust any of the companies...
Russian roulette,
some people say Geopeptides is legit, they did get good reviews from other websites
listen man why ask our opinion if your just going to contradict everything we say, come on...
Geopeptides is not a good source at all, but you don't have to take my word for it. You can go with that source and find out for yourself.
Peptides are probably the hardest thing to find legit honestly, and like said they are just a complete pain in the ass to dose etc, for very little benefit. I'll take MK-677 all day every day over a whole stack of peptides
Similar threads
