Opinion on running certain compounds without test.

[Becool12]

Running compounds such as tbol, EQ, snd anavar with the absence of test. How do you guys feel about people who do this? I've heard of deca solo runs as well, but not common. The compounds I listed aren't necessarily "mild" in anyway shape or form, yet have less side effects than most anabolics, IE, tren, deca, dbol, anadrol, etc. that is just my opinion, I feel as though lower doses of let's say for example, anavar, which holds lower sides at a moderate dose compared to anadrol.

I have a well known friend and coach who recommends and has done EQ and tbol only cycles. He says they are much lighter on side effects than even test. My friend is big on staying lean, maintaining hair, digestive health, etc.

Now, I've seen people run tbol only and EQ only with proper pct and did not experience much suppression. Would like to hear how you all feel or whether this is the dumbest idea ever.

And no, this is no my intention. I'm just curious and have seen others do this. I guess an EQ solo would be appropriate for someone dealing with low t though. I'm big on longevity, performance, lean gains, etc.

 

[DylanGemelli]

Running compounds such as tbol, EQ, snd anavar with the absence of test. How do you guys feel about people who do this? I've heard of deca solo runs as well, but not common. The compounds I listed aren't necessarily "mild" in anyway shape or form, yet have less side effects than most anabolics, IE, tren, deca, dbol, anadrol, etc. that is just my opinion, I feel as though lower doses of let's say for example, anavar, which holds lower sides at a moderate dose compared to anadrol.

I have a well known friend and coach who recommends and has done EQ and tbol only cycles. He says they are much lighter on side effects than even test. My friend is big on staying lean, maintaining hair, digestive health, etc.

Now, I've seen people run tbol only and EQ only with proper pct and did not experience much suppression. Would like to hear how you all feel or whether this is the dumbest idea ever.

And no, this is no my intention. I'm just curious and have seen others do this. I guess an EQ solo would be appropriate for someone dealing with low t though. I'm big on longevity, performance, lean gains, etc.

Regardless of low T or not, its not something I would recommend and especially not with low T and then top that off with no pct? im lost as to how that makes any sort of sense... so ultimately, that's further suppressing yourself, which you MOST CERTAINLY will do with eq and/or tbol or any other steroid for that matter... Im lost on how anyone could give you that sort of recommendation whatsoever but its not good at all... these are the type of people that get others hurt and i would LOVE to have a one on one conversation with in person...

 

[cbbram00]

Re: RE: Opinion on running certain compounds without test.

Running compounds such as tbol, EQ, snd anavar with the absence of test. How do you guys feel about people who do this? I've heard of deca solo runs as well, but not common. The compounds I listed aren't necessarily "mild" in anyway shape or form, yet have less side effects than most anabolics, IE, tren, deca, dbol, anadrol, etc. that is just my opinion, I feel as though lower doses of let's say for example, anavar, which holds lower sides at a moderate dose compared to anadrol.

I have a well known friend and coach who recommends and has done EQ and tbol only cycles. He says they are much lighter on side effects than even test. My friend is big on staying lean, maintaining hair, digestive health, etc.

Now, I've seen people run tbol only and EQ only with proper pct and did not experience much suppression. Would like to hear how you all feel or whether this is the dumbest idea ever.

And no, this is no my intention. I'm just curious and have seen others do this. I guess an EQ solo would be appropriate for someone dealing with low t though. I'm big on longevity, performance, lean gains, etc.

I ran Anadrol and Deca alone on 2 separate occasions because I didn't know what I was doing and I will never do it again. Suppression at it's best and severe acne because I didn't use an AI. I'm really glad you're asking the question before hand but I'm here to tell you to learn from my mistakes. DON'T DO IT!

Always use Test as a base...

 

[Becool12]

Running compounds such as tbol, EQ, snd anavar with the absence of test. How do you guys feel about people who do this? I've heard of deca solo runs as well, but not common. The compounds I listed aren't necessarily "mild" in anyway shape or form, yet have less side effects than most anabolics, IE, tren, deca, dbol, anadrol, etc. that is just my opinion, I feel as though lower doses of let's say for example, anavar, which holds lower sides at a moderate dose compared to anadrol.

I have a well known friend and coach who recommends and has done EQ and tbol only cycles. He says they are much lighter on side effects than even test. My friend is big on staying lean, maintaining hair, digestive health, etc.

Now, I've seen people run tbol only and EQ only with proper pct and did not experience much suppression. Would like to hear how you all feel or whether this is the dumbest idea ever.

And no, this is no my intention. I'm just curious and have seen others do this. I guess an EQ solo would be appropriate for someone dealing with low t though. I'm big on longevity, performance, lean gains, etc.

Regardless of low T or not, its not something I would recommend and especially not with low T and then top that off with no pct? im lost as to how that makes any sort of sense... so ultimately, that's further suppressing yourself, which you MOST CERTAINLY will do with eq and/or tbol or any other steroid for that matter... Im lost on how anyone could give you that sort of recommendation whatsoever but its not good at all... these are the type of people that get others hurt and i would LOVE to have a one on one conversation with in person...

I would definitely not run anything like this with my state. I've seen others do it and was just trying to clear things up. This would be with a proper pct of course.

The guy who recommended it seems a bit off. I won't say any names but he is popular over fb.

Thanks for all the help. Everyone is very knowledgable here .

 

[RickRock]

Re: RE: Opinion on running certain compounds without test.

Running compounds such as tbol, EQ, snd anavar with the absence of test. How do you guys feel about people who do this? I've heard of deca solo runs as well, but not common. The compounds I listed aren't necessarily "mild" in anyway shape or form, yet have less side effects than most anabolics, IE, tren, deca, dbol, anadrol, etc. that is just my opinion, I feel as though lower doses of let's say for example, anavar, which holds lower sides at a moderate dose compared to anadrol.

I have a well known friend and coach who recommends and has done EQ and tbol only cycles. He says they are much lighter on side effects than even test. My friend is big on staying lean, maintaining hair, digestive health, etc.

Now, I've seen people run tbol only and EQ only with proper pct and did not experience much suppression. Would like to hear how you all feel or whether this is the dumbest idea ever.

And no, this is no my intention. I'm just curious and have seen others do this. I guess an EQ solo would be appropriate for someone dealing with low t though. I'm big on longevity, performance, lean gains, etc.

I know people who have done it, but I personally would never recommend it. I believe in always having a test base for well-being and libido. It will not contribute to side effects at all of you run a TRT level of test or say 150-250mg per week. Regardless of running test or not, if you running any sort of AAS you will be shutdown too

 

[DylanGemelli]

Running compounds such as tbol, EQ, snd anavar with the absence of test. How do you guys feel about people who do this? I've heard of deca solo runs as well, but not common. The compounds I listed aren't necessarily "mild" in anyway shape or form, yet have less side effects than most anabolics, IE, tren, deca, dbol, anadrol, etc. that is just my opinion, I feel as though lower doses of let's say for example, anavar, which holds lower sides at a moderate dose compared to anadrol.

I have a well known friend and coach who recommends and has done EQ and tbol only cycles. He says they are much lighter on side effects than even test. My friend is big on staying lean, maintaining hair, digestive health, etc.

Now, I've seen people run tbol only and EQ only with proper pct and did not experience much suppression. Would like to hear how you all feel or whether this is the dumbest idea ever.

And no, this is no my intention. I'm just curious and have seen others do this. I guess an EQ solo would be appropriate for someone dealing with low t though. I'm big on longevity, performance, lean gains, etc.

Regardless of low T or not, its not something I would recommend and especially not with low T and then top that off with no pct? im lost as to how that makes any sort of sense... so ultimately, that's further suppressing yourself, which you MOST CERTAINLY will do with eq and/or tbol or any other steroid for that matter... Im lost on how anyone could give you that sort of recommendation whatsoever but its not good at all... these are the type of people that get others hurt and i would LOVE to have a one on one conversation with in person...

I would definitely not run anything like this with my state. I've seen others do it and was just trying to clear things up. This would be with a proper pct of course.

The guy who recommended it seems a bit off. I won't say any names but he is popular over fb.

Thanks for all the help. Everyone is very knowledgable here .

its great to ask brother and that's what the forum is all about... you need to ask questions and continue to learn and clear up all the shit information that gets passed around throughout the internet... its quite evident that the person who advised this does not know their ass from a hole in the ground but at least you got it cleared up and that's what we are here for!

 

[Becool12]

Running compounds such as tbol, EQ, snd anavar with the absence of test. How do you guys feel about people who do this? I've heard of deca solo runs as well, but not common. The compounds I listed aren't necessarily "mild" in anyway shape or form, yet have less side effects than most anabolics, IE, tren, deca, dbol, anadrol, etc. that is just my opinion, I feel as though lower doses of let's say for example, anavar, which holds lower sides at a moderate dose compared to anadrol.

I have a well known friend and coach who recommends and has done EQ and tbol only cycles. He says they are much lighter on side effects than even test. My friend is big on staying lean, maintaining hair, digestive health, etc.

Now, I've seen people run tbol only and EQ only with proper pct and did not experience much suppression. Would like to hear how you all feel or whether this is the dumbest idea ever.

And no, this is no my intention. I'm just curious and have seen others do this. I guess an EQ solo would be appropriate for someone dealing with low t though. I'm big on longevity, performance, lean gains, etc.

Regardless of low T or not, its not something I would recommend and especially not with low T and then top that off with no pct? im lost as to how that makes any sort of sense... so ultimately, that's further suppressing yourself, which you MOST CERTAINLY will do with eq and/or tbol or any other steroid for that matter... Im lost on how anyone could give you that sort of recommendation whatsoever but its not good at all... these are the type of people that get others hurt and i would LOVE to have a one on one conversation with in person...

I would definitely not run anything like this with my state. I've seen others do it and was just trying to clear things up. This would be with a proper pct of course.

The guy who recommended it seems a bit off. I won't say any names but he is popular over fb.

Thanks for all the help. Everyone is very knowledgable here .

its great to ask brother and that's what the forum is all about... you need to ask questions and continue to learn and clear up all the shit information that gets passed around throughout the internet... its quite evident that the person who advised this does not know their ass from a hole in the ground but at least you got it cleared up and that's what we are here for!

^^ Thanks for all of the responses. I am now aware that you should always have a dose of test, small or not, unless competition purposes.

Thank you, Dylan. This is what I love about this forum. Even when asking somewhat dumb questions, I don't get flamed and hated. Could go on about the other message boards....

 

[PHURIOUS]

You should always have some kind of test base. If even a trt level dose.


PHURIOUS PHARMA

 

[TheSVPdeal]

I run everything with nothing more than a TRT dose of test. I do this every time however.

 

[RickRock]

Re: RE: Re: Opinion on running certain compounds without test.

Running compounds such as tbol, EQ, snd anavar with the absence of test. How do you guys feel about people who do this? I've heard of deca solo runs as well, but not common. The compounds I listed aren't necessarily "mild" in anyway shape or form, yet have less side effects than most anabolics, IE, tren, deca, dbol, anadrol, etc. that is just my opinion, I feel as though lower doses of let's say for example, anavar, which holds lower sides at a moderate dose compared to anadrol.

I have a well known friend and coach who recommends and has done EQ and tbol only cycles. He says they are much lighter on side effects than even test. My friend is big on staying lean, maintaining hair, digestive health, etc.

Now, I've seen people run tbol only and EQ only with proper pct and did not experience much suppression. Would like to hear how you all feel or whether this is the dumbest idea ever.

And no, this is no my intention. I'm just curious and have seen others do this. I guess an EQ solo would be appropriate for someone dealing with low t though. I'm big on longevity, performance, lean gains, etc.

Regardless of low T or not, its not something I would recommend and especially not with low T and then top that off with no pct? im lost as to how that makes any sort of sense... so ultimately, that's further suppressing yourself, which you MOST CERTAINLY will do with eq and/or tbol or any other steroid for that matter... Im lost on how anyone could give you that sort of recommendation whatsoever but its not good at all... these are the type of people that get others hurt and i would LOVE to have a one on one conversation with in person...

I would definitely not run anything like this with my state. I've seen others do it and was just trying to clear things up. This would be with a proper pct of course.

The guy who recommended it seems a bit off. I won't say any names but he is popular over fb.

Thanks for all the help. Everyone is very knowledgable here .

its great to ask brother and that's what the forum is all about... you need to ask questions and continue to learn and clear up all the shit information that gets passed around throughout the internet... its quite evident that the person who advised this does not know their ass from a hole in the ground but at least you got it cleared up and that's what we are here for!

^^ Thanks for all of the responses. I am now aware that you should always have a dose of test, small or not, unless competition purposes.

Thank you, Dylan. This is what I love about this forum. Even when asking somewhat dumb questions, I don't get flamed and hated. Could go on about the other message boards....

That's why you are in the right place brother! Adrenaline Rush is like no other board out there

 

[DylanGemelli]

Running compounds such as tbol, EQ, snd anavar with the absence of test. How do you guys feel about people who do this? I've heard of deca solo runs as well, but not common. The compounds I listed aren't necessarily "mild" in anyway shape or form, yet have less side effects than most anabolics, IE, tren, deca, dbol, anadrol, etc. that is just my opinion, I feel as though lower doses of let's say for example, anavar, which holds lower sides at a moderate dose compared to anadrol.

I have a well known friend and coach who recommends and has done EQ and tbol only cycles. He says they are much lighter on side effects than even test. My friend is big on staying lean, maintaining hair, digestive health, etc.

Now, I've seen people run tbol only and EQ only with proper pct and did not experience much suppression. Would like to hear how you all feel or whether this is the dumbest idea ever.

And no, this is no my intention. I'm just curious and have seen others do this. I guess an EQ solo would be appropriate for someone dealing with low t though. I'm big on longevity, performance, lean gains, etc.

Regardless of low T or not, its not something I would recommend and especially not with low T and then top that off with no pct? im lost as to how that makes any sort of sense... so ultimately, that's further suppressing yourself, which you MOST CERTAINLY will do with eq and/or tbol or any other steroid for that matter... Im lost on how anyone could give you that sort of recommendation whatsoever but its not good at all... these are the type of people that get others hurt and i would LOVE to have a one on one conversation with in person...

I would definitely not run anything like this with my state. I've seen others do it and was just trying to clear things up. This would be with a proper pct of course.

The guy who recommended it seems a bit off. I won't say any names but he is popular over fb.

Thanks for all the help. Everyone is very knowledgable here .

its great to ask brother and that's what the forum is all about... you need to ask questions and continue to learn and clear up all the shit information that gets passed around throughout the internet... its quite evident that the person who advised this does not know their ass from a hole in the ground but at least you got it cleared up and that's what we are here for!

^^ Thanks for all of the responses. I am now aware that you should always have a dose of test, small or not, unless competition purposes.

Thank you, Dylan. This is what I love about this forum. Even when asking somewhat dumb questions, I don't get flamed and hated. Could go on about the other message boards....

bro, there is no such thing as a bad question except the infamous "will i keep my gains?" or "how much will i keep?" etc... those are the only questions i can't take... LOLLL

you should never get flamed or abused for asking questions... i fucking can't stand that shit... i was always so uncomfortable seeing that... what so many of these pricks forget is that ALL of us were new to this and we all asked simple questions but these "simple" questions are not so simple when first learning... you should never have to endure that... forums are supposed to help not deter people... they are supposed to help but that got lost along the way... this is why it is so much different here and why nothing is like adrenaline rush... trust me, i will make sure it is always like this and only gets better... you ask whatever you want bro and i'll always be here to help and so will many others... the questions and answers are what make this place what it is supposed to be and what it is... a family

 

[Lenwood]

This is definitely the best board I've ever seen. I love the humility of even the experts. No one deserves to be flamed, no matter how stupid the question might be.

A "stupid" question just shows a need for more information, not a need for hatred and vitriol.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[DylanGemelli]

This is definitely the best board I've ever seen. I love the humility of even the experts. No one deserves to be flamed, no matter how stupid the question might be.

A "stupid" question just shows a need for more information, not a need for hatred and vitriol.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

WELL SAID AND I COMPLETELY AGREE and that's why we will always be different here because i won't have it any other way!

 

[Bio-Tech]

You will always want a test base.

 

[cbbram00]

Re: RE: Re: Opinion on running certain compounds without test.

This is definitely the best board I've ever seen. I love the humility of even the experts. No one deserves to be flamed, no matter how stupid the question might be.

A "stupid" question just shows a need for more information, not a need for hatred and vitriol.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

That's why I'm here... Well said!

 

[cbbram00]

Re: RE: Re: Opinion on running certain compounds without test.

You will always want a test base.

Yes... Suppression is not fun...

 

[RickRock]

Re: RE: Re: Opinion on running certain compounds without test.

This is definitely the best board I've ever seen. I love the humility of even the experts. No one deserves to be flamed, no matter how stupid the question might be.

A "stupid" question just shows a need for more information, not a need for hatred and vitriol.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

You are absolutely right brother, and that's exactly the type of place we want here. It's all about helping out one another. Everyone has different levels of experience and knowledge and we want to do what we can to help everyone. There is no such thing as a stupid question to those legitimately wanting to learn

 

[Becool12]

Re: RE: Re: Opinion on running certain compounds without test.

This is definitely the best board I've ever seen. I love the humility of even the experts. No one deserves to be flamed, no matter how stupid the question might be.

A "stupid" question just shows a need for more information, not a need for hatred and vitriol.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

You are absolutely right brother, and that's exactly the type of place we want here. It's all about helping out one another. Everyone has different levels of experience and knowledge and we want to do what we can to help everyone. There is no such thing as a stupid question to those legitimately wanting to learn

Yes, exactly. I've always heard more diverse and standard gear advice, so wanted to clear things up. Always heard test is needed, but sometimes you get those individuals who aren't using any and competitors as well.,This makes total sense to me now and I didn't get flamed, but actually learned.

 

[DylanGemelli]

Re: RE: Re: Opinion on running certain compounds without test.

This is definitely the best board I've ever seen. I love the humility of even the experts. No one deserves to be flamed, no matter how stupid the question might be.

A "stupid" question just shows a need for more information, not a need for hatred and vitriol.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

You are absolutely right brother, and that's exactly the type of place we want here. It's all about helping out one another. Everyone has different levels of experience and knowledge and we want to do what we can to help everyone. There is no such thing as a stupid question to those legitimately wanting to learn

Yes, exactly. I've always heard more diverse and standard gear advice, so wanted to clear things up. Always heard test is needed, but sometimes you get those individuals who aren't using any and competitors as well.,This makes total sense to me now and I didn't get flamed, but actually learned.

yes bro... the problem is you will get so many different pieces of advice out there... sometimes certain things just work for some people that don't for most... there is no rhyme or reason... its always best to ask and trust me, you will not get flamed... if i ever catch anyone getting flamed, the person doing it will be dealt with swiftly... that shit will not ever go on here...