redsnapper812006
Member
How does it take before I start to feel something from the lgd.... Been on a week and a day and I don't feel any different
Lgd4033
- Thread starter redsnapper812006
- Start date
Re: RE: Lgd4033
For some people it takes longer to see performance or body changes than others. It also depends on other factors like your diet and training. Give it a bit longer, make sure you have your diet right and are training right, and see where you are at then.redsnapper812006 said:
redsnapper812006
Member
Right... I feel like my training is spot on and diet isn't terrible but very limited on days I work 12 hour shifts and can't bring in a lot .... I'm just going to keep on keeping on
redsnapper812006 said:
lgd and mk are the two that take quite a bit longer to really kick... 10-14 days is generally what you can expect
21infantry
Active member
Dylan your full of facts what is the anabolic rating of LGD isn't something like 66?
21infantry said:
To my know.edge, sarms do not have anabolic to androgenic ratios, because they are not androgens or anabolic steroids. They are an entirely different class of compounds being selective androgen receptor modulators that are not rated by that scale
21infantry said:
lol thank you bro... read rick's post on this, that covers it... there is no "anabolic rating" so that number would be purely speculative based on impact etc. in comparison to anabolics
BigJay23 said:
It's kinda like comparing apples to oranges honestly because they have nothing in common. Gains depend on too many things too. You can get great gains from test, but some people respond better than others. Also depends on the dose, etc. S4 and other sarms obviously also produce nice gains. I just don't think it's fair to either to compare the two since they are so different.
21infantry
Active member
I think the User needs something to compare against each other and obviously Test is pretty much the standard for Muscle building so everything is compared against it. How it actually builds muscle is not really there concern. I guess its like HGH and Test comparisons they both build muscle but go about different ways of doing it, Sarms is no different. Personally I have reacted pretty well to Sarms and can kind of compare it when I was on pretty high doeses of test. I built more muscle on high doeses of test, not saying that Sarms isn't doing that for me, but fat loss, recovery and Hardness seems to be better on Sarms.
Really the best way to look at it is risk versus reward. Sarms offer a lot of reward with minimal risk in terms of side effects and shutdown, because both of those are minuscule in comparison. When it comes to gains, you may end up with less actual muscle gain on sarms than test, but your risk versus reward is much higher. With test or other AAS, you get shutdown hard and have potential side effects. In the end it's your ultimate choice to decide what the best route for you to take is
