LGD-4033 vs Turinabol
- Thread starter dros
- Start date
LGD-4033 is effective for strength gains and has virtually zero side effects, or suppression if any at all. I've never experienced any myself.
t-bol MUST BE TAKEN WITH TESTOSTERONE so get the idea of only taking tbol out of your head unless you want to fuck yourself up badly. So there is suppression, need for pinning, tbol like all orals is liver toxic therefore on cycle support is a must as well as a complete PCT afterwards. AGAIN GET THE DUMB IDEA OUT OF YOUR HEAD ABOUT RUNNING AN ORAL ONLY AAS CYCLE.
Trust me, people get dumb ideas all the time and if you're having one, get rid of the thought. Don't jump on the short bus. Either do shit the right way, or not at all. You might wanna stick to SARMs and do some reading about AAS FROM CREDIBLE SOURCES before you explore AAS any further.
Why Oral Only Cycles are Horrible... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0n7A...ature=youtu.be
t-bol MUST BE TAKEN WITH TESTOSTERONE so get the idea of only taking tbol out of your head unless you want to fuck yourself up badly. So there is suppression, need for pinning, tbol like all orals is liver toxic therefore on cycle support is a must as well as a complete PCT afterwards. AGAIN GET THE DUMB IDEA OUT OF YOUR HEAD ABOUT RUNNING AN ORAL ONLY AAS CYCLE.
Trust me, people get dumb ideas all the time and if you're having one, get rid of the thought. Don't jump on the short bus. Either do shit the right way, or not at all. You might wanna stick to SARMs and do some reading about AAS FROM CREDIBLE SOURCES before you explore AAS any further.
Why Oral Only Cycles are Horrible... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0n7A...ature=youtu.be
I'm not running an oral only cycle.....
Precautionary measure since we see it all the time... hard to separate the window lickers sometimes. Glad to hear your tongue is windex free.
I'm not running an oral only cycle.....
LOLLLL GOOD ONE... 44 even appreciated that bro!
im not going to sit here and tell you that lgd is stronger because its not... tbol is going to get your more size but not a ton more.. you can get 10-12 with lgd and more like 10-15 with tbol... tbol will get you stronger but lgd will get you close to what tbol gives for strength... however, lets talk side effects and sustainability... tbol is not horrible on sides but has FAR more than lgd... clearly it has more suppression, its hepatoxic and as all steroids, it could cause acne, hair loss etc... is it likely to, no, but can it, yes... with lgd, you have far more sustainability of gains, far less sides and FAR less recovery time... although for me, you would want to stack them together on a kickstart to your cycle... when you stack these two with rad140, you are going to see dbol like results without the side effects...
21infantry
Active member
Love me some TBol favorite oral or non oral by far.
Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk
Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk
It's extremely hard to compare the two, since one is an oral steroid and one is a sarm.....but I'll give you my take on the positives and negatives of each.
For Tbol, I think it's an excellent lean bulker. Generally side effects are very low and it can be an awesome dry compound for adding size and strength. IObviouosly it carries toxicity to the liver which isn't good, and it can only be ran for about 6 weeks max. It also has a lot more suppression than a sarm would have.
LGD is non toxic, and one of the more powerful sarms for size and strength. It's not as powerful as Tbol, but it can be ran twice as long for 12 weeks so in the long run you get nice steady gains throughout that are easier kept. Suppression and side effects are very low with it as well.
(PM me for a price list for Biotech Labs and 10% discount)
For Tbol, I think it's an excellent lean bulker. Generally side effects are very low and it can be an awesome dry compound for adding size and strength. IObviouosly it carries toxicity to the liver which isn't good, and it can only be ran for about 6 weeks max. It also has a lot more suppression than a sarm would have.
LGD is non toxic, and one of the more powerful sarms for size and strength. It's not as powerful as Tbol, but it can be ran twice as long for 12 weeks so in the long run you get nice steady gains throughout that are easier kept. Suppression and side effects are very low with it as well.
(PM me for a price list for Biotech Labs and 10% discount)
SpikedEggnog
Active member
TBOL beats LGD of course. but there are pros and cons to using each. SARMS will never compete with steroids on anabolic level but they are used because less sides, safer, easy to obtain, oral, etc. regardless, you cant really compare sarms and steroids. that's apples to oranges bro.
Lol, I admit I did initially get pissed, but the meme was so damn good I couldn't say shit. I do appreciate quality smart assedness.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
21infantry
Active member
44 how many cell phones you go through a year!
Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk
Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk
What if you stacked LGD with S4. The strength gains compared to TBOL?
Reason I'm asking is, i'm not looking to add too much size. I'm a competitive athlete and i'm mainly looking for strength and muscular endurance. Ofcourse cardio with the GW.
Last edited:
personally, i could care less what anyone else says on this one because i know first hand what kind of strength you get from stacking these two and i would pick them over tbol alone for strength, absolutely... lgd and s4 is the best sarms duo you can possibly run...
Lol.. that's good shit. I wonder how many PS/Xbox controllers he's crushed or thrown against the wall.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
let me know if you have further questions bro... im happy to help you set up a stack
