This is something I'm a little confused about and would appreciate if somebody could clear up for me. Testosterone is 100%anabolic and 100% androgenic and trenbolone is 500&500 so tren is 5x as potent as test and also 5x as harsh with side effect?
Also winstrol is 320%anabolic and 30% androgenic, so does this mean that winstrol is 3x as anabolic as test but with 70% less androgenic side effects?? ( I know you have to run an oral along side test )
But I'm just trying to work this anabolic to androgenic ratio.
So for instance if I did anavar which has 400%anabolic to 24% androgenic activity compared to say turinabol to which is 180% anabolic 50% androgenic, then on paper anavar wins by a mile in case of results to side effects.
From what I've seen and heard on this forum this couldn't be wrong. So if somebody could clear this up for I'd really appreciate it.many thanks
Dean
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Also winstrol is 320%anabolic and 30% androgenic, so does this mean that winstrol is 3x as anabolic as test but with 70% less androgenic side effects?? ( I know you have to run an oral along side test )
But I'm just trying to work this anabolic to androgenic ratio.
So for instance if I did anavar which has 400%anabolic to 24% androgenic activity compared to say turinabol to which is 180% anabolic 50% androgenic, then on paper anavar wins by a mile in case of results to side effects.
From what I've seen and heard on this forum this couldn't be wrong. So if somebody could clear this up for I'd really appreciate it.many thanks
Dean
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk