Updates

[sogoyyy]

Not sure if y'all familiar with the in body body composition machine. Most Max Muscle stores have them.

Wasn't too mad about my stats. 220lbs 6.4%bf. This is what I use as a baseline. One can argue how accurate it is, this is just what I use.
Still trying to grow these muscles.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

 

[svanimost]

Wow, that's beats a caliper!!! No mess , looks nice and accurate!!

 

[sogoyyy]

Wow, that's beats a caliper!!! No mess , looks nice and accurate!!

Its def a good measure. Wanna get legs to 30. Plus I have no inflammation

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

 

[svanimost]

What kind of machine measure that precise??? The only two I've seen is handheld and a scale you stand on computer thingy??

 

[44YOGearHead]

6.4%?? What method is used to determine this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[DylanGemelli]

6.4%?? What method is used to determine this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yea, im wondering that too... physique looks excellent but 6.4 is not what im seeing here...

 

[sogoyyy]

What kind of machine measure that precise??? The only two I've seen is handheld and a scale you stand on computer thingy??

Yea it's called in body like on the paper. Look it up its a 10k piece of equipment. Its pretty nice. I use it on all my clients. Look it up its really nice. If you have a max muscle store in your city they should have one.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

 

[sogoyyy]

yea, im wondering that too... physique looks excellent but 6.4 is not what im seeing here...

https://www.inbodyusa.com/products/inbody-270

Guys I've said in the past, there's soo many different tools you can use to get body fat. The cheap lil handheld Omron in la fitness, or skin calipers or these. You just pick one and use it as a baseline. I don't care what the bf% reads I look at body fat mass lean body mass, weight of each leg and arm etc. Check the link out If there is a better machine you have access to, then so be it. This is what I use. When I do it again next month with the same variables I can track changes. I like the water weight numbers and visceral fat

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

 

[Titan Research Labs]

The results wouldn't load on my phone, so idk how recently they were done, but I've seen this guy at sub 7% for sure. Maybe not in the pictures in this thread, but within the last couple months, he's been stage ready in physique class. I remember seeing some pretty decent shots recently.

[email protected]

 

[DylanGemelli]

i think hes in excellent condition... looks absolutely great, there's no doubt on that whatsoever... thats not even questionable... ive always said that about him...

 

[sogoyyy]

i think hes in excellent condition... looks absolutely great, there's no doubt on that whatsoever... thats not even questionable... ive always said that about him...

Thanks. I still have ways to go. I hate being a numbers guy but I don't like the 220. I want 215 while keeping the 206 lean if possible or accurate.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

 

[Titan Research Labs]

Yeah brother you look great, if those are recent pics, I'd say you're around 9-10% at the most. We have almost identical stats, I'm 5'11" and usually hold about 230 and 9% ish. At like 7% you see a HUGE drying out effect and start seeing that "bodybuilder" look and anything lower starts looking crazy shredded at our height/weight.

I do agree with your method of sticking with one test method though, it keeps you accurate on changes you make personally, I just think the 6% range is a bit low for what I see in those pictures

[email protected]

 

[DylanGemelli]

Yeah brother you look great, if those are recent pics, I'd say you're around 9-10% at the most. We have almost identical stats, I'm 5'11" and usually hold about 230 and 9% ish. At like 7% you see a HUGE drying out effect and start seeing that "bodybuilder" look and anything lower starts looking crazy shredded at our height/weight.

I do agree with your method of sticking with one test method though, it keeps you accurate on changes you make personally, I just think the 6% range is a bit low for what I see in those pictures

[email protected]

thats exactly the way i saw it too bro... spot on as usual!

 

[Titan Research Labs]

thats exactly the way i saw it too bro... spot on as usual!

I guess we can't all be 5% like someone I know... haha!

Guy looks awesome for the physique class though, his stage pics are outstanding! I'd be sweating it if he was competing in my area for sure!

[email protected]

 

[sogoyyy]

thats exactly the way i saw it too bro... spot on as usual!

I agree. I don't put much focus on %. Mainly as I'm prepping to make sure I'm going in right direction. I feel around 11% still.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

 

[sogoyyy]

I guess we can't all be 5% like someone I know... haha!

Guy looks awesome for the physique class though, his stage pics are outstanding! I'd be sweating it if he was competing in my area for sure!

[email protected]

Dylan is a beast. I'm trying to get that low. My diet just sucks.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

 

[EZ_E]

Thanks. I still have ways to go. I hate being a numbers guy but I don't like the 220. I want 215 while keeping the 206 lean if possible or accurate.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

We're always our own worst critic. You're size and symmetry are on point for off season. 6.4%? Who knows, really who cares? Mirror is all you need bossman.

You're building a tremendous package for Classic Physique.

 

[RickRock]

You look great bro! Very nice aesthetics. I look for you to do well in the classic physique class

 

[44YOGearHead]

Yeah brother you look great, if those are recent pics, I'd say you're around 9-10% at the most. We have almost identical stats, I'm 5'11" and usually hold about 230 and 9% ish. At like 7% you see a HUGE drying out effect and start seeing that "bodybuilder" look and anything lower starts looking crazy shredded at our height/weight.

I do agree with your method of sticking with one test method though, it keeps you accurate on changes you make personally, I just think the 6% range is a bit low for what I see in those pictures

[email protected]

I agree, stay with one method for accuracy sake. I was thinking 10% in the pics and I was curious as to what machine might have said he was sub 7% because I've been at 7% way back in my prime and as you stated it's a dry grainy, serrated look where everything pops out at you and whomever sees you. Undoubtedly he has a very competitive build for a physique guy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[cbbram00]

Looking good bro... Much respect!