napsgeareudomestic
bannednutritionRegenRx

My upcoming cycle

i literally just told you to run test tren and mast or test primo and winstrol? im so confused here man... you can lower the dose of tren if you want to try to avoid side effects... i cant decide for you what you want to run, i just give options
 
i literally just told you to run test tren and mast or test primo and winstrol? im so confused here man... you can lower the dose of tren if you want to try to avoid side effects... i cant decide for you what you want to run, i just give options
Thanks Dylan.
And how much should my maesteron dosage be?

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
 
1-10 test prop 100 mg eod
1-10 tren ace 100 mg eod
1-10 mast prop 200 mg eod
1-10 aromasin 12.5 mg eod
1-10 caber .25 mg e3d
5-10 winstriol 50 ng day
5-10 ORGAN ST https://www.dganutrition.com/product/organ-st/
7-10 POST CT https://www.dganutrition.com/product/post-ct/


pct 11-16

when you are in pct, you are going to get a major spike in cortisol... cortisol is termed the "gains killer" for a reason... it will put you into a catabolic state which will not allow you to build muscle and at the same time will eat it away, on top of the fact you will also get unwanted fat gain... so you will lose muscle and gain fat that you had just busted your ass an entire cycle for... GW and MK prevent the rise in cortisol... not only that but they keep you performing at a level you were while on cycle being the ultimate performance enhancers they are... on top of the fact that mk2866 is the ultimate for healing and recovery, which is imperative in pct as well as keeping strength up to a very high level... gw will also treat cholesterol and blood pressure, which are definitely things that need addressed in pct as well…Organ ST plays a pivotal role in a post-cycle therapy (PCT). There’s a strong misconception that the role of a PCT is simply to restart the natural testosterone production that was shut down from the steroid cycle. While this is true, there are a lot of the other issues that the body has to deal with during a PCT: hormone fluctuations, high liver enzymes, increased blood pressure, pressure on the kidneys and endocrine system, high stress and cortisol levels, the list goes on...Organ ST helps address all of these problems and helps you recover in a timely manner. The quicker you recover, the less likelihood of any long-term problems occurring, and the more likely that all gains you make during your cycle are retained.





clomid 50/50/50/25//25/25
nolva 40/40/40/20/20/20
aromasin 12.5 mg eod
ORGAN ST https://www.dganutrition.com/cycle-support/organ-st
mk-2866 25 mg day (ONLY 4 WEEKS)
gw-501516 20 mg day
 
Maybe halo but id never advise. Its wicked tho


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
yes and no though because you are not going to gain any size with halo and it doesn't have all the capabilities of tren... plus you are SERIOUSLY limited on how long you can run it
 
yes and no though because you are not going to gain any size with halo and it doesn't have all the capabilities of tren... plus you are SERIOUSLY limited on how long you can run it

No for sure. I know but for me i harden up fast on that it likes my body for some reason


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Thats actually not undersized for 5’10”.

706b496f4153355b3533789339a8614d.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Where did you pull that chart from? Not slamming just curious because I don't feel I'm a large framed individual hahaha

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
Anyone overly muscular is not considered in range but above range. When you talk about it scientifically


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
i know thats a chart that is shown online but look at how large the weight is... im sorry but 6'1 168 is undersized... in a major way... or 6'2 172 etc...
 
Yeah I thought the same thing honestly. That's why I said I'm not a large frame haha... fuck I can barely fit a large shirt lol

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
i know thats a chart that is shown online but look at how large the weight is... im sorry but 6'1 168 is undersized... in a major way... or 6'2 172 etc...

Undersized for steroid use or for life which is just what i was showing in general 172 is considered norm. I was 172 in my 20’s i was thin but had muscles. Thats all i was showing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I think its safe to say those Charts don't apply to us lol

No for sure. But i think sometimes because of who we are and what we are into we say undersized when its really just average. So when advising someone for steroid use we get a little too caught up on some things. When i first used steroids i was 190. And some would probly say i was “undersized” for aas use but i wasnt and went from 190 to 240 in 4 years of hard work and dedication. Thats all i was saying. That it can be done. If im alone in that then thats ok.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
No for sure. But i think sometimes because of who we are and what we are into we say undersized when its really just average. So when advising someone for steroid use we get a little too caught up on some things. When i first used steroids i was 190. And some would probly say i was “undersized” for aas use but i wasnt and went from 190 to 240 in 4 years of hard work and dedication. Thats all i was saying. That it can be done. If im alone in that then thats ok.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't disagree with you at all bud. A lot of guys get wrapped up in numbers on bodyweight etc, but there's always different factors in the equation. I was about 165 when I ran my first cycle, but I'm not a very tall guy and I was about 8% bodyfat at 5'9". I was very muscular and had a very solid base. At that point I had already been accused of using steroids for years. I'm about 197 now, and just for reference my avatar pic is from 4 years ago at about 170
 
I don't disagree with you at all bud. A lot of guys get wrapped up in numbers on bodyweight etc, but there's always different factors in the equation. I was about 165 when I ran my first cycle, but I'm not a very tall guy and I was about 8% bodyfat at 5'9". I was very muscular and had a very solid base. At that point I had already been accused of using steroids for years. I'm about 197 now, and just for reference my avatar pic is from 4 years ago at about 170

For sure. Thats all i was saying. The number isnt so crucial more the physique.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Undersized for steroid use or for life which is just what i was showing in general 172 is considered norm. I was 172 in my 20’s i was thin but had muscles. Thats all i was showing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
for steroid use, extremely undersized... for normal life, all good bro but we both know that 6'1 172 is not even remotely close to building natural potential in the gym so the info was great but i want to make sure people understand the difference here
 
Top Bottom