Is more always better?

[Frater]

Often I see guy's who wants to start a first sarm cycle. They ask for advice and they get always recommended a sarm stack.

I wonder if it isn't better to try first each sarm seperatly so you know how you react on it and later stack these sarms?

Are the results much bigger if you stack more sarms for example rad, lgd and mk2866? Or can you get equal results with rad and lgd fot example.

I like to here what your think of it or have experienced.

Forgive me my bad english but I hope that it's clear.

 

[RickRock]

Often I see guy's who wants to start a first sarm cycle. They ask for advice and they get always recommended a sarm stack.

I wonder if it isn't better to try first each sarm seperatly so you know how you react on it and later stack these sarms?

Are the results much bigger if you stack more sarms for example rad, lgd and mk2866? Or can you get equal results with rad and lgd fot example.

I like to here what your think of it or have experienced.

Forgive me my bad english but I hope that it's clear.

You can get good results running each sarm by themselves, but they shine best when stacking. Also Sarms are not anything like steroids when it comes to side effects, so you can't compare the two. It's fine as a beginner to run a stack of sarms because there are no adverse reactions or side effects to worry about. You are always free to do as you please, but if it were me I would run the best possible scenario for your goal. Running a single sarm can cut you short on what you can achieve, because sticking them with the synergy between them is where the real magic happens. They are recommended in stacks for a reason. People have specific goals, and we give them the best recommendation to meet that goal. We don't ever give half ass recommendations

 

[bodean30]

Sarms are a little different as opposed to AAS. Sarms work very synergistically with each other and you will get much better results from stacks rather than single compounds. They don't change your hormone levels the way steroids do.
It's always a good idea to take a conservative approach when introducing your body to a foreign stimulus. While I wouldn't recommend running a stack of every sarm there is, you can safely run a stack of 2-3 sarms and have impressive results. Just read up on the proposed sarms and know the possible side effects.
So I would say in the case of sarms yes, more is better. Don't misconstue that to mean higher doses are better.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

 

[RickRock]

Often I see guy's who wants to start a first sarm cycle. They ask for advice and they get always recommended a sarm stack.

I wonder if it isn't better to try first each sarm seperatly so you know how you react on it and later stack these sarms?

Are the results much bigger if you stack more sarms for example rad, lgd and mk2866? Or can you get equal results with rad and lgd fot example.

I like to here what your think of it or have experienced.

Forgive me my bad english but I hope that it's clear.

You can get good results running each sarm by themselves, but they shine best when stacking. Also Sarms are not anything like steroids when it comes to side effects, so you can't compare the two. It's fine as a beginner to run a stack of sarms because there are no adverse reactions or side effects to worry about. You are always free to do as you please, but if it were me I would run the best possible scenario for your goal. Running a single sarm can cut you short on what you can achieve, because sticking them with the synergy between them is where the real magic happens. They are recommended in stacks for a reason. People have specific goals, and we give them the best recommendation to meet that goal. We don't ever give half ass recommendations

 

[DylanGemelli]

sarms are FAR FAR different than steroids... you can run them solo if you want and still get good results but these stacks are not going to carry many side effects at all and you can get so much more allowing them to work together... there's nothing wrong with trying them solo bro but for the bigger results, you want to stack them...

 

[Frater]

Good to hear, so you will get better results when stacking them because of the synergy. Then I' ll go all the way.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk

 

[DylanGemelli]

Good to hear, so you will get better results when stacking them because of the synergy. Then I' ll go all the way.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk

did you need any help setting up a stack bro?

 

[Frater]

No thanks,
I' m running at the moment 25 mg mk 2866 each day for 2 weeks. After 4 weeks I'm planning to add GW for 20 mg a day and run this for 12 weeks incl pct

The next cycle is lgd with s4 and gw for getting lean and hopefully add a couple pounds of muscle.
I' ve got this already from sarmx

At first it was the plan to start with this cycle.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk

 

[RickRock]

No thanks,
I' m running at the moment 25 mg mk 2866 each day for 2 weeks. After 4 weeks I'm planning to add GW for 20 mg a day and run this for 12 weeks incl pct

The next cycle is lgd with s4 and gw for getting lean and hopefully add a couple pounds of muscle.
I' ve got this already from sarmx

At first it was the plan to start with this cycle.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk

Sounds like a good plan bro. Keep us posted!

 

[DylanGemelli]

No thanks,
I' m running at the moment 25 mg mk 2866 each day for 2 weeks. After 4 weeks I'm planning to add GW for 20 mg a day and run this for 12 weeks incl pct

The next cycle is lgd with s4 and gw for getting lean and hopefully add a couple pounds of muscle.
I' ve got this already from sarmx

At first it was the plan to start with this cycle.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk

excellent bro.. keep us updated on the results and let me know anytime you have questions...