Why isn't igf1 for a bridge

[Againaday]

Ok just a question after reading up a little on igf1 (I think pharma tricked us all into a new cycle addition). Why is igf1 not used as a bridge for cycle since if used correctly it appears to have the ability of most anabolics without the suppression sides if done correctly. Is it only because of it being relatively expensive or I'm I missing something? Well just curious to see the pros give their insight.
Happy new year to the best team on the Internet.

 

[mastermolnar]

Ive never used it. Cant attest to its value in this world. It can cause growth gut along with it needing to be cycled. From what I understand it works better in conjunction with AAS so that could be why

 

[GTFORMULA]

I'm taking it right now post workout in the muscle groups I worked. Not sure if I would use it any other way. From what I read it is only an aid to help growth. Not really for standing alone.

 

[stretch512]

When it comes to the idea of bridging I think peptides like igf-1 and sarms are perfect. Any thing to help you hold on to your gains is going to be a good thing.

 

[DylanGemelli]

one of the reasons is its EXTREMELY difficult to find quality igf... its not prevalently used for this as well as people just being scared of it in general.. heres an article to read on igf side effects and concerns with athletes

http://www.esupplements.com/article/igf-1-side-effects/