Just curious from members here. If you had a choice of only one which would you believe is the best for GH? MK677 and CJC with DAC. MK is oral so that is very beneficial but CJC -DAC is only injected once or twice a week so that is fine. It seems CJC actually increases GH more than MK but Mk does it in pulses which mmics the body's own natural production. So again which would you guys think is best. Thanks
Which is better for GH CJC with Dac or Mk 677
- Thread starter 10aaa88
- Start date
bro, there is no need to post twice... everyone gets to every thread... mk677 is far more effective... i have used cjc with and without dac several times and every single time it has resulted in nothing but disappointment... mk677 is FAR more profound, far more versatile and PROVEN quality where peptides right now are the sketchiest they have ever been... for me, its a no brainer.. its a landslide... you can try them both or whatever you like but i wouldnt even consider cjc in comparison to 677... here is a link to the best quality 677 you can find... its ultimately up to you but be prepared to be underwhelmed with cjc if you choose to run it... https://www.sarmsx.com/nutrobal-mk-677
Similar threads
