middle aged fat guy":7n29b0wd]Thanks everyone!
Yeah it's an awesome read.. my mrs pre ordered us 2 copies back in the day and we still have them :)
The carb up is well beyond anything I would ever try. I always wondered if the original concept for the book was to implement the use of insulin.
Bodyopus somehow put everything into perspective very quickly for me personally. Even the great Vince Girondas eating plans suddenly made sense despite 99% of pundits at the time proclaiming that anything other than 'chicken and rice' was bullshit and wouldn't work. I also remember the Anabolic Diet
I can't take credit for the original dump though - I just found it online. Here's another one:
[b]LINK:[/b] [url="http://www.anasci.org/ebooks/USH%20II.pdf said:
http://www.anasci.org/ebooks/USH%20II.pdf[/url]
Yeah this link was very popular. Everybody read this one. I think the book you link you first posted from Dan was called "Underground Body Opus Militant Weight loss"
Only Dan could come up with that title. The book was spot on. Everybody that I know who used it did get ripped. But if you go back to Vince he was doing the same thing with one carb meal every 2 days. Dan's method was a little more work. You had to do things at exact times, which kind of made it hard to folllow. I mean I am not waking up at 2am to eat 4 jelly beans. But in that book all of Dan's eccentricities come out loud and clear.[/quote:7n29b0wd]
I love the simplicity and effectiveness of Vinces diets.. do you remember the hawaiian cutting diet? Awesome stuff. Being low carb meal timing wasn't that important either, which makes most of his plans super livable for most people.
Ah, I think the magazine you wrote Vince in might have been called musclemag international? I could be very wrong there though lol
I gotta say I love that Ric Drasin is doing what he's doing right now. It's easy for people to dismiss gurus of the past as being batshit, but Ric is still around, trained at Venice with everyone, ate with everyone and took drugs with them - so how can anyone argue with what he states as being simple fact? Great stuff