.jpg "Research Chemical Sciences")
Sk-11
- Thread starter Rmg1055
- Start date
yk 11 is still in early studies... even thinking about using it yet is not wise and considering the source, it sounds even worse... as ny robo said, send him to the forum
21infantry
Active member
Not wise IMO to throw something in the body without exstensive research or labs rats with a long history of use before clearing the product safe and side effects made clear. I do know that some Sarms have been devastating to the body and you don't hear much about those.
exactly... that's why things are put in thorough testing phases... when things are created, some work out and some don't... when they don't, they are generally discontinued everywhere... when things are still in testing, you want to wait and find out more thorough findings first...
SpikedEggnog
Active member
i agree about the testing BUT i dont care much for rat studies and the such, rats are extremely different then humans needless to say, so that really doesnt hold much merit imo....PLUS there are many old school cycles that have been tested by countless bodybuilders before you - why waste such valuable info like that and instead use a foreign substance that isnt even proven to be effective. just get some TEST lol..
Have your buddy come here and check out everything available from pure essence, which is all 100% legit, safe, and proven to give amazing results
Exactly what I was trying to tell him. From the looks of it, it only looks like it's been out MAYBE a few years, can't trust that. Will not know what it will do to him in the long run. Thanks for the feed back
21infantry
Active member
Believe it or not they choose rats because they actually mimic human reactions better then monkeys and most other Animals out there. Its not because they have Green Peace sensibilities.
SpikedEggnog
Active member
thats fine but animals are not humans....many people out there believe otherwise but this is why rat studies and monkey studies have no real world validity..in the end human trials are what is needed and even then, it is not 100% because of variables between humans and their lifestyles, etc.
ive never been big on rat testing either... yes, its beneficial to a point but we all know that does not always translate to the effect on humans, especially with size and structural factors clearly far off... there's really only one way to accurately gauge the effects on a human and thats by testing them on a human
