Hey Dylan. I have been following you and all your information you put out on SARMS. Greatly appreciate all the info. I have been searching to find the detection time of Ostarine but have come to no avail. That's why I figured I would reach out to you since you know so much about SARMS. Do you have any info on how long SARMS and specifically ostarine are detected for on a drug test? Thanks for the help!
Sarms
- Thread starter sanaters22
- Start date
you are not going to find that answer anywhere bro because noone has it... thats why you are having trouble finding it.. there are literally no consistent or known detection times on any sarms at this point...
There's no concrete info in that bro. Only speculation. It's all up to you on how much risk you take when it comes to detection times
I found this study:
https://www.bisp-surf.de/Record/PU201308005798
States a single dose of 30mg is detectable through metabolites around 2 week.
I would assume 4 months is enough time to be clean?
Anyone know much about metabolites and their excretion time?
I also found a separate study that said 9 days in urine for metabolites and 21 days in feces. So I think saying 14 days for single dose metabolites is safe.
i would not go by that at all.. i ve seen people test positive for sarms after a month of being off on a few occasions...
Yeah but that is saying after a single dose. So you would need to assume after continuos use it would be much longer. Just like the half life of any substance. If you use something for a week, it will be detected longer than if used for a day. So if they say 14 days after single use I would say the metabolite half life would be 7 days. 10 half life's to completely expelled from your system would make it 70 days to be clear.
okay bro... you are doing guesswork on something that is not confirmed... you cannot correlate that with buildup through an entire cycle... im certainly not going to tell people something that is not confirmed anywhere... then you can get people in trouble because they are led to believe something that is not accurate
Hey man, I'm not saying my word is law. I'm just brainstorming and thinking out load. Trying to get discussion going seeing if anyone else out there has options, experience or knows more. No need to get defensive. Never meant to seem like what I am saying is golden or 100 percent certain. I am very aware all of my info is guessing, I'm just trying to provide some sense of knowledge I have received on the subject. I saw 2 studies saying similar things so I am voicing them so hopefully one day we will maybe have an answer.
LMFAO... how on earth am i being defensive... it makes sense what you are saying and i appreciate you trying to come up with something but my "defensiveness" is in regards to people getting the wrong idea.. trust me, people then turn the blame when something may not be accurate and then you are accountable... thats my concern is that people get the wrong idea... not sure how anything i said was defensive.. its called making a point bro... quite a significant difference
Must have just misinterpreted the way I read your reply.
all good bro and I DO appreciate you even trying to come up with something and provide this info because regardless, it is helpful
Thanks man I appreaciate it
for sure bro!
Similar threads
